var disqus_url = 'http://www.insidecosmeceuticals.com/news/2011/06/sunscreen-penetration.aspx';

Beach Bum: Sunscreen Penetration

Comments
Print

RALEIGH, N.C.—According to a study at North Carolina State University, UVB-damaged skin slightly enhanced titanium-dioxide or zinc-oxide nanoparticles penetration in sunscreen formulations, but no transdermal absorption was detected (Toxicol Sci. June 3, 2011). Sunscreens containing titanium-dioxide (TiO(2)) and zinc-oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles (NP) are effective barriers against UVB damage to skin, although little is known about their disposition in UVB-damaged skin. Therefore, researchers exposed pigs to UVB, giving them a moderate sunburn. For in vitro studies, skin in flow-through-diffusion-cells were treated for 24 hours with four sunscreen formulations: 10 percent-coated-TiO(2)-in-oil/water (o/w); 10 percent-coated-TiO(2)-in-water/oil (w/o); 5 percent-coated-ZnO-in-o/w; and 5 percent-uncoated-ZnO-in-o/w. TiO(2) primary particle size was 10 x 50 nm with mean agglomerates of 200 nm; ZnO mean was 140 nm. Skin was processed for light (LM), scanning (SEM) and transmission-electron-microscopy (TEM) and time-of-flight-secondary-ion-mass-spectrometry (TOF-SIMS).

UVB-exposed skin had typical sunburn histology. TEM showed TiO(2) NP 17-layers into stratum corneum (SC), while ZnO remained on the surface. TOF-SIMS showed TiO(2) and ZnO epidermal penetration in both treatments. Perfusate analyzed by TEM/EDX or inductively coupled-plasma-mass-spectrometry (ICP-MS) detected no titanium or zinc, indicating minimal transdermal absorption. In vivo, skin was dosed 24 hours occluded with formulations and at 48 hours. TiO(2)-NP in o/w formulation penetrated 13-layers into UVB-damaged SC, while only seven-layers in normal; TiO(2) in w/o penetrated deeper in UVB-damaged SC. Coated and uncoated Zn-NP in o/w were localized to the upper 1-2 SC layers in all skin. By SEM, NP were localized as agglomerates in formulation on the skin surface and base of hair. TOF-SIMS showed titanium within epidermis and superficial dermis, while zinc was limited to SC and upper epidermis in both treatments.

/**/ var loc = window.location.pathname;var nt=String(Math.random()).substr(2,10);document.write ('');
/**/
Comments
//window.disqus_no_style = true; (function() { var SHORTNAME = 'insidecosmeceuticals'; // Your website's shortname on Disqus var dsq = document.createElement('gascript'); dsq.type = 'text/javagascript'; dsq.async = true; dsq.src = 'http://disqus.com/forums/' + SHORTNAME + '/embed.js'; (document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0] || document.getElementsByTagName('body')[0]).appendChild(dsq); })();
/**/
 
//= 0) { query += 'url' + i + '=' + encodeURIComponent(links[i].href) + '&'; } } document.write(''); })(); //]]> /* var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-624328-41"); pageTracker._setDomainName("auto"); pageTracker._trackPageview(); /*]]>*/